Gnosis and Tikkun
We discussed how the Western path of development includes two large groups of strategies aimed at purification and realization of consciousness.
In turn, purification of consciousness may include various approaches depending on the technique itself and the type of impurities that need to be removed.
In addition to purely “technical” approaches to confronting the obscuration of consciousness, it also matters which specific destructors this confrontation is aimed at.
Throughout the history of humanity, it has faced major breakthroughs at least three times of the Edge by goetic demons, and at least twice — with serious expansion by Interworld predators. At present, the third mass invasion of Fomorian forces is taking place, and humanity once again needs a revival of technologies for countering those who halt consciousness.
Since the main target of kidemons is the element of desire, strategies for purifying the mind from the influence of these gatekeepers were aimed, first of all, at working through the sensual aspect, the aspirations and attractions arising in the psychocosmos. At the same time, to overcome the obscurations of heimarmene, technologies of holistic gnosis were developed — gnosis. One can say that malus is “purified” by “opening” the mind to the Light, whereas hyle is “entering” the focus of mind into the Light.
Goetic gatekeepers distort, first and foremost, the motivational basis of the mind, and therefore the correction of a mind affected by kidemons consists in searching for and reconstructing “true desires,” primordial impulses arising in the stream of consciousness as a need for certain realizations that open paths for its further development. Archons and fomors distort the causal component, deprive the mind of clear understanding of itself and the world, and therefore a reduction of their influence can be achieved through cultivating “true gnosis,” through work on one’s worldview.
If, as a result of the activity of kidemons, “false desires,” destructive aspirations, arise in the mind, then the activity of archons blocks the emergence of desires altogether, and the mind falls into apathy. At the same time, one can distinguish the sluggishness of the mind that comes from a lack of energy and develops as a result of any outflow, and a “deep” deficit of desires that comes from “not understanding” why “one should want anything at all.” In the first case, desires seem to exist, but one is lazy or there is “no strength” to realize them; in the second, they are present only as ideas, without real potential, and even adding energy has no stimulating effect.
It is clear that the technologies of “correction” and “viewpoint” closely overlap and imply one another: gnosis is always accompanied by “illumination” of desires, and purification of motivations stimulates clarity of cognition. Besides, of course, both groups of consumers of mental energy always coexist, and it is hardly possible to find a person possessed by the Gatekeepers yet free from fomors, just as there are no people subject to heimarmene who are free from the bonds of disvoluntation. Nevertheless, different emphases, different directionality, and different descriptions of the “enemies” from whom these technologies primarily aim to liberate make it possible to speak of them as two paths of evolution of mind.
When a person feels that they are “confused about their desires,” or when they discover destructive gravitations or attractions in themselves, they should pay attention to the technologies of “correction” and work on the active matrices of their mind. And when drowsiness or apathy takes hold of them, when their capacity for realization decreases and their creative potential falls — they should work on their worldview and outlook.
Therefore, one can say that modern conditions acutely require the revival of gnosticism as a worldview that makes it possible to cope with the total virtualization of the world, find new supports within it, and stimuli for life and development.
It’s late. The forces are disappointed in mankind. The race will be pushed aside, at best. People are darkening. The system has completely rotted. Lack of goals. There was hope for the reasonable Yoma virus, which was called Covid, that people would learn to appreciate life, but that did not happen. Do you know why there are so many deaths? The virus tried to correct the matrix, but people are so distant from the foundation that the organism could not cope. When I asked the forces about hope for restoration, do you know what they asked me: Have you looked into the eyes of children, what do you see there? The light is fading.
But this does not mean that it’s time to give up. Initially, people were created to be Creators, and I personally will do my utmost to climb out of this pit and become who I should be. This is what I wish for everyone.
Hello. Dear Enmerkar, could you clarify what historical events you are referring to: ‘Throughout human history, it has encountered major breaches of the Boundary by goetic demons at least three times, and at least twice—serious expansions of interworld predators.’ If for the first category there are assumptions: the medieval inquisition, colonization and slavery, world wars, then the second one is hard to understand. Drug trafficking? Alcohol business on a state scale? Although it is clear that what is happening now is a massive enslavement of active consciousness by imposing time spent on social networks and virtual reality.
Hello. Goetic demons: the first time – Sumer, about 3000 years BC, the emergence of slavery; the second time – late Middle Ages, plague epidemics, inquisition; the third time – Beginning of the 20th century – World War II. Formorians: the first time – boundary of the New Era, Roman civilization; the second time – transition to the New Age.
Thank you! Indeed, as some readers write, it can be difficult to understand your texts, as there is a very strong concentration of ideas, meanings. Therefore, analogies, examples from material reality are very helpful. Thank you! Could you explain what the Formorian invasion during the Roman Empire and during the transition to the New Era was about? How did they influence people? And what helped us survive? Or were there irreversible changes?
Formorians are always a retreat from the liveliness of consciousness and reliance on external, technical means. Humanity gradually forgets to rely on itself and increasingly depends on ‘iron’. Losing a smartphone nowadays is far more frightening than losing one’s soul.
Of course, there is no factory that will bake bread more delicious than what my grandmother baked. However, factory bread can feed a larger number of hungry mouths. Therefore, we cannot avoid ‘relying on external technical means’. I think it is important to emphasize ‘the liveliness of consciousness’ here. Otherwise, we are tempted to blame progress for our troubles. Perhaps, on the contrary, the development of ‘iron’ stimulates the living to become even more alive.
What role do Grigori play in this? Do they hold back breaches, or do they encourage them?
It depends on the balance of energies. Grigori always aim for equilibrium. But most often they just observe.
Do you know examples of Grigori manifestation on the material plane, aside from the case described in the book of Enoch? I want to know how such forces manifest themselves on our plane, as you described above in the comments about the manifestation of Formorians and goetic demons.
Such manifestations belong more to Conspiracy Theory than to Magic) For example, when at intergovernmental meetings someone appears who convinces to adopt a decision different from what was planned, or in a military operation, the balance of power is strangely shifted.
What exactly does the ‘know how’ of gnosticism consist of—don’t gnostics consider this world an illusion and think about how to quickly escape from it?
The task of the gnostic is not just to ‘escape’ from the material world, but to free as many ‘sparks of spirit’ as possible from its shackles. Therefore, their ‘know-how’ consists of a collection of skills for identifying these sparks and developing a ‘liberating perspective.’
Please do not take this as a personal complaint or an attempt to influence your choices. This is a real question that interests me. You, like many serious practitioners writing online, avoid ‘practical articles’. That is, the description of specific rituals and practices, rather than their theoretical justifications. I think I understand why. The issue of responsibility for the ‘logs’ that people might break while trying to reproduce the practice without a teacher from the internet. Perhaps you have other reasons. But, in the context of this article, do you not think that this partly contributes to the ‘virtualization’ and strengthening of distractors from the stops? After reading, for example, this article, a number of people will get the illusion of understanding how to fight with fomors, and this may hinder them in real battles. Again, I emphasize, the problems of publishing practices ‘without censorship’ in open access are understandable. It is precisely in the context of the phenomenon described in this article that I am interested in whether the purely theoretical component does not generate comparable problems, just of a different nature.
Correct vision can serve as a reliable foundation for developing one’s own practices. However, copying someone else’s techniques without a clear understanding of their mechanisms is highly likely to lead to mistakes and failures. As the sages said, ‘the study of Kabbalah is the very occupation of Kabbalah.’ By reading this note, ‘a number of people’ will only receive a direction in which it would be good for them to think independently. In fact, the best that any book or article can give is a reason and direction for one’s own reflections. Each conclusion must be confirmed by one’s own experience; therefore, a correctly presented concept is always an incentive for practice.
Good day. Good question, Zarak. I will answer honestly. I have been reading this blog since 2009. In 2010, I attended the seminar of Kolo Veles. I am grateful to Enmerkar for pulling me out and helping me start on the path of change and development. But after the seminar, I couldn’t stop, and this required finding a Teacher or school. As a result, I met what I was looking for, but upon starting my studies, I realized that having read this blog for a long time, I had set up many false concepts and constructions in my consciousness and my Teacher had to break everything down in my mind. I had to study from the basics and rebuild everything from scratch. At the present time, I also visit and read this blog but already have a solid foundation for my vision and practices. I wish everyone development.