The Choice of Reality
The idea of the multiplicity of universes, alternative realities, which is only now entering the minds of some scientists, was an obvious fact to Magi since ancient times.
Magic has always understood that, within the fullness of the Cosmos, every event in the past, present, and future occurs in all possible ways, and therefore reality is both fully actual and wholly potential. When we say, “I see the world,” we mean that one of the infinite states of mind forms or describes one of the infinite states of being. In other words, right now an infinite number of Enmerkars in an infinite number of realms are writing this (or a similar, or a completely different) post, just as an infinite number of Enmerkars are engaged in entirely different affairs and living entirely different lives. Meanwhile, what is actual for one “variant” of reality remains potential for all the others, hidden in the darkness of the probability space. Just as being, taking shape through mind, realizes itself in an infinite number of ways, mind brings about that realization along an infinite number of paths. Each individual mind, each Monad, by manifesting in all available ways, exists simultaneously in all its states and therefore in all the “parallel” realities available to it. It is in this sense that Magic says we are not objects, we are processes, because with every action we pass from one state to another, from one reality to another, without any “basis” or “carrier” for these transitions and realities. For Magi, to speak of “reality” is to speak of awareness; to change awareness is to choose reality. Magical visualizations, which underlie many Rituals, are not merely a method of creative thought — they are a concrete means of transforming the flows of reality. And when Magi say that reality is as we are aware of it, they do not mean a purely psychological phenomenon but a fully physical, energetic fact. Likewise, working with “anchor points” — amulets, Names and Principles — is the art of choosing the reality that the given manifestation of the Monad creates and within which it will exist. This reality is labile; it stands in a constant equilibrium between the actual and the potential, between manifestation and virtuality, and both of these modes constantly mix and transform into one another. Yet for each individual stream of awareness this appears as its own “line of time,” its own stream of reality, within which its conditionally continuous and causally determined life takes place. It is for this reason that Magi always speak of responsibility: every choice the mind makes, every branching point, is, in fact, a choice of reality in which one or another of its streams, one or another variant, will manifest. Although the individual mind as a whole does exist simultaneously in all possible states, nevertheless its overall stream, composed of all these manifestations, has a general vector, and each manifestation contributes to it. Therefore, although every choice is made in all possible ways, their proportions may differ. The fullness of manifestation does not mean stasis; it does not imply the absence of movement and development. Accordingly, Magic — as the art of choosing reality through awareness — is also the art of developing the mind. Striving for awareness, for realization, the Magus actively makes choices and therefore actively shapes the reality in which their awareness takes place. And, of course, the state of each of the countless manifestations of that individuality affects both the individuality as a whole and each of its manifestations — this is precisely what Magic means by “the growth of the soul” and “the accumulation of experience.” Although Magic does not believe in the immortality of personality, it in no way denies the importance of personal efforts; on the contrary, it insists on their necessity and critical importance for the overall state of mind both in the given individuality and in the fullness of the Great Spirit.
Reality does not change. You change. You are your Reality.
Quote: “In other words, there are now an infinite number of Enmerkar in an infinite number of spaces writing this (or a similar, or completely different) post…”. Question 1: Do these Enmerkar possess self-awareness? If yes, then in principle they are not Enmerkar, because by this name we mean your awareness. If not, then it is difficult to say that they exist (only by means of external observation). If self-awareness is common to all of you (monad?), then how is its division carried out? Question 2. If their (your) number is infinite, then where is the boundary between an Enmerkar and a shrimp (after all, an infinite number must go through all options of manifestation). In other words, one can say that an Enmerkar is the entire possible and impossible Universe. Or is this series still not infinite?
1. There is no division of consciousness, but there are different forms and ways of perception, including different views of oneself. Accordingly, all Enmerkar are manifestations of the same individuality manifesting itself under different conditions, and therefore – in different ways. But different ways are not different consciousnesses.
2. Absolutely correct, consciousness is one, but manifests itself in infinite multiplicity.
I’ve already considered the option that consciousness is indivisible, but here you either bump into the fact that since consciousness is indivisible and I clearly possess consciousness, then my consciousness is the only possible one (that is, I am God, which is not confirmed by capabilities, well, or such a crummy God), or consciousness lives all roles sequentially, but then how we communicate – I am communicating with myself, just in different aspects (?) (frightening), or parallelly, but I don’t understand how I can divide when it is singular by nature. Or to recognize all this as a ‘miracle’ and not break my head over it (but I can’t do that).
It is simply incorrect to equate ‘I’ with consciousness. Consciousness can well be transpersonal and impersonal, and therefore – a multitude of ‘I’s of different levels and degrees of integrality within a single consciousness does not contradict logic.
That is, ‘my’ consciousness, the current content of which is the life of a certain human character, is some kind of fragment of ‘big’ consciousness? I just use the word ‘I’ as a synonym for consciousness.
Even ‘my’ consciousness – an individual psychocosmos – is far from being exhausted at the ‘I’ level, no matter how developed this level is, especially the Psychocosmos as such. ‘My’ consciousness is that tonality, that ‘slice’ of the Psychocosmos available for immediate ‘internal’ exploration by the personality. For exploring other ‘areas’ of the Psychouniverse, transpersonal focusings of consciousness are necessary.
Well, what term is there for immediate consciousness-perception (that is, I look at the screen, type text, think ‘I need to call mom’ in the moment). I understand that ‘psychocosmos’ is a broader concept? I call such perception ‘awareness’, but maybe I am using this word incorrectly?
https://enmerkar.com/en/way/the-cosmos-of-mind
https://enmerkar.com/en/myth/where-do-monsters-live
https://enmerkar.com/en/way/the-contents-of-our-mind
https://enmerkar.com/en/way/mind-and-the-illusion-of-personality
Thank you, your theory is wonderfully written. Do you happen to know the method where attention is constantly focused on oneself? That is, I started with attention to breathing during daily activities for a year, then moved my attention to the feeling of I, held it for several years (4-5), then it became automatic and consciousness somehow became centered within itself. But what to do next is still unclear. That is, consciousness has become strong but still cannot escape the tight shell. Although I don’t even remember how I lived 6-7 years ago, it was like a dream on the go.
The striving for a correct understanding is not just ‘theory’, but a condition for effective actions. For example, in order to learn to effectively interact with a circular saw, it is not necessary to first lose a number of organs upon contact; it is enough to correctly understand the principle of its operation – and then interaction with it can be effective and not traumatic. Similarly, effective work of consciousness is significantly easier to achieve if the principles of its functioning are correctly understood. In particular, in the case you described – it is ineffective to believe that consciousness must ‘break out of the shell’. Effective understanding in this case is that this very ‘shell’ is a product of consciousness, just like the ‘content’. If one performs various manipulations, ‘techniques’ on consciousness ‘blindly’ and observes what comes of it – one can indeed achieve success, but how long it will take to achieve that is a big question. In your case, a clear understanding of the structure of consciousness will help to take the next step – to transition from ‘I’ to its principle – the Self, then – to selfless presence, and then – to non-dual being/awareness.
Do not consider it arrogance for me to respond to the question you posed to the esteemed Enmerkar, but it resonated within me.
You described the practice of conscious breathing. Such tracking can sometimes be painful; I usually shed tears. It is a necessity, like personal hygiene, for example. But it leads to totality.
It’s not quite clear what you meant by going beyond. I will assume that you meant what is now referred to as dream hacking.
For this, another training is suitable, try to focus all free attention on the space between your eyebrows, gathering it bit by bit, increasing the intensity while relaxing the facial muscles. But do not abandon exercises with the heart either.
Focusing on the space between your eyebrows quickly becomes a habit. Many people write that as soon as they become aware in a dream, they are immediately thrown out. This principle lies in the legendary trick of finding hands; all attention focuses on one point and this keeps you in the dream, like an anchor that does not allow waves and wind to carry the ship away.
In theory, high awareness is a guarantee of frequent awakenings, but in practice, everything depends on libido, and then it’s a confusing forest; on one hand, authoritative sources say that it’s necessary to bury one’s libido forever, allegedly the mortification of the flesh is a direct way to exit, as you put it, “from beyond the borders of the shell”. But this leads to suppression and a kind of psychosis. Others argue that it is possible to emerge from beyond the borders with the help of tantric models of development, but that’s an entirely different tangled forest. I find it entirely unclear.
The fact is that concentration or contemplation will help you stay in the dream, while awareness, as they say, is a matter of energy presence.
“But what comes next is still unclear.”
German..
* You realize who you are.
* You remember who you are, how you got here, and why. (And because there might be a key in this. And because everyone goes through memory disconnection here.)
* You recognize the picture of the real world.
* You discover who is nearby from your star family (if such existed), because there might be a common Path with them.
* You discover your abilities.
* You discover your own interests.
* You take action.
Focusing attention on oneself is mandatory here. Without it, awareness resets to zero for almost everyone…
What to do with this awareness? Accumulate it. Why? To accumulate Power. To manage oneself and reality, at least as much as needed.
What is ‘transpersonal focusing of consciousness’? – going beyond one personality and transitioning to another? – the merging of one ‘I’ into another ‘I’?… Consciousness, of course, is more than I, at least because sometimes correct decisions and answers to questions come seemingly out of nowhere, from silence – from those areas of consciousness that are not currently focused on, yet they still exist.
But at the same time, consciousness is not separate from I, from the current I, which is the reference point, the point of assemblage of perception, so to speak, of reality))
But what is meant by the I and the reference point?) Well, the choice of reality – here is such an example.
I am, for example, a Monad and I have in my hands 22 major arcana of tarot. I draw the arcana of the magician, I begin experiencing it. I am the magician, I associate myself with the magician, and reality adjusts to the experience of the arcana of the magician. However, then I pull out the arcana of the High Priestess and who am I now?)) But who draws cards from the deck? The magician, the high priestess? And is the card of the magician the reference point?
Now imagine, I am a Monad and I have in my hands 22 arcana, 24 runes, 7 chakras, 72 spirits of goetia, etc. and so on. And I resonate both with the arcana and with the runes, and with chakras (how could I do without them) and there are many demons. In everything, I can find myself, and time is limited. What is the problem of choosing reality?
“But what is meant by the I and the reference point?” – a good question……………………but…..it’s not that simple with the answer……….there are your descriptions, there are mine. The possibility of using someone else’s descriptions lies in the effect of resonance (provided the systems of the speaker and listener are aligned)……………….. I am the Reference Point (I threw away everything I had in my hands, dropped all my clothes, and let the energy lines spread freely………………Only by throwing off a lot, very much Excess – Can you, with fear, panic, and trepidation, Behold Your Very Self…………that was how it happened for me 🙂
Well, yes, there may be differences. As Castaneda put it – stalkers, dreamers, TS) The paradox in my case is that if I throw away the cards and external systems, what will I have left?) Right. Internal systems with their inherent symbolism and zoo. And the long game called “down with the mask” will begin. The more distortions of perception you correct in the psyche, the closer to the true self you get. However, you have reached your essence, and I somehow have not. The further I go, the more confused I seem to become…
Hmm…
“But what is meant by the I and the reference point?)”
Primary luminosity. Light ID.
There are no forms there. And there are no masks either.
There are no forms there, there are no masks. You merge with something that can be called the Divine and feel a comprehensive Presence. Is there an I here – a debatable question, is there a point, a reference… also. There is only Presence. Are you talking about this?))
Teo: Esteemed Teo, I just wished to add to what you said CORRECTLY: “There are no forms. And there are no masks either…”, by “bell tower” I meant the so-called “prism” present in many.. THERE IS ONLY PURE, UNTWISTED REALITY, CRYSTAL CLEAR TRUTH understood by ALL AND EVERYTHING… 😉
Perhaps those unconscious areas from which answers and correct solutions come are simply someone else, a wiser individuality, alive and real, whom we all refuse to recognize as existing. After all, power does not exist outside its carriers, thus consciousness may only exist within the framework of personalities. To assert that the silent sphere is a transpersonal form of perception that is inseparable from the observer, who is the reference point, is subjective idealism; it is denial of the reality of someone else besides you, and conviction in your exclusivity. And other people are just bots. Sorry to disappoint you, but you are not the center of the universe.
Perhaps those unconscious areas from which answers and correct solutions arise, are also I – that part of me, my individuality – wiser, more alive, and real, which I and ALL of us simply refuse to recognize as existing, refuse to pay Attention to?
_
If we identify Personality and I – then, yes – Co-Knowledge is only possible within the framework of the Knowing, Perceiving subject………… simply put – there is a perceiving (I, personality) – there is perception, there is a knowing (I, personality) – there is consciousness…….no perceiving – no perception – no world, no god – No Nothing..
_
The question is what baggage of the past we carry within ourselves. Have we cleaned ourselves, have we set ourselves free? And to what extent? – from prejudices, stereotypes, conventions, evaluative judgments…………..Unconditioned Perception – is also I (the perceiving)
_
In my opinion, Reality as a Thing in Itself – is Unknowable to the mind and even more so is Ineffable in Words…..however, Reality is Knowable through Feeling, because I – Feeling is Inseparable from Reality…………Feeling and nothing else is the Material of Awareness.
_
As for denying the reality of someone else besides me and conviction in my exclusivity………………………….I am a conscious unit, you are a conscious unit, we are – Infinity (us – conscious units, points of reference, points of collective perception) …..Infinity of individual realities, Infinity of Reflections of Conscious Feeling of the One Whole (Great Spirit) Knowing Itself as the Totality of Separate Parts.
_
You look at me through the eyes of God (Great Spirit), which dwells in you – and find in my eyes the reflection of the same God, who while in me simultaneously exists in You…
Tavita Shauta: *I am a conscious unit, you are a conscious unit, we are Infinity (us – conscious units, points of reference, points of collective perception) ….Infinity of individual realities, Infinity of Reflections of Conscious Feeling of the One Whole (Great Spirit) Knowing Itself as the Totality of Separate Particularities.* – this is the NONSENSE of Buddhist monks, and nothing more…
“I have already considered the option that consciousness is indivisible, but here you either bump into the fact that since consciousness is indivisible and I clearly possess consciousness, then my consciousness is the only possible one (that is, I am God, which is not confirmed by capabilities, well, or such a crummy God), or consciousness experiences all roles sequentially, but then how we communicate – I communicate with myself, just in different aspects (?) (frightening), or parallelly, but I don’t understand how I can divide when it is singular by nature. Or to recognize all this as a ‘miracle’ and not break my head over it (but I can’t do that).”
German…
We are – Theo, German, Enmerkar, Tavita Shauta – these are different I.
Not one I.
This is proven as follows:
Give me a command to do something…
Will I do it? If I do it, then +1 to the fact that I – yours.
Further…
Can I do something that you cannot, do in principle, and never do?
If I can, then I am not you. Then I am I. And you are you.
About like that. 🙂
I had such a period when life was rolling into hell and I turned to higher powers (unconsciously, that is, not thinking about the consequences) and a miracle happened! It happened instantly; everything was sorted out in a day. Moreover, in such a favorable direction that I did not expect. It seemed that I had left home and returned to another reality, where everything was going in the best way, and there was no black streak. The people around seemed to have some kind of amnesia, and I did not dare to start a conversation about it. But this miracle had a downside. I walked for a long time as in a lucid dream. For me, this reality was unusual. It seemed as if it should not exist and I was just asleep. At the same time, I felt like I lived two lives. Outside, everything was wonderful, and inside, I felt the continuation of my past life and that hell until I suddenly realized that that part of me was dead. I do not know whether this is magic or a psychological effect. However, now I have two I’s – one alive, the other dead. The living feels cast away, without purpose; the dead lives on the inside of life and all its experiences can be linked to spiritual development (I attribute it to the soul). The living is fixed in time, the dead – unclear. Its experiences relate to the past – “past lives”, or perhaps to the future “what will happen to me when I die” or all this is happening in the present moment, “in that moment which I see”? Therefore, the feeling of division into parts and living several lives at once is familiar to me (I know that this is treated in psychiatric hospitals). Integration of past lives is somewhat similar, but these lives do not happen in the now.
In general, quite a strange effect; with every choice and decision, we change our movement, and every choice is multi-variant. The only thing I can explain is that with every choice we move within our line, regardless of left or right, we move along one lane. This gives us greater involvement in reality. Consciousness is still a complex thing))
Milita – if you are interested, in Human Design there is the concept of double and sometimes triple definition. This is when there is a double and triple grouping of chakras, respectively. And this grouping creates a separate personality. It may be the case that this is your variant. Awareness goes through a specific group, and not unambiguously through one – i.e., the understanding of the current self varies.
Thank you, esteemed crackjack. You have provided me with some quite interesting information.
My processor is stuck. In 40 years, this is probably the first thank you for the information. Now I have the thought – could it really be like this?
In response, I found another answer for myself – why can egrigors even be born.
So, your ‘I’ is real, while the entire rest of the world is not? No, or worse, your ‘I’ is the axis of the universe, isn’t it? What if there is some abstract substance, like water, for example, and also there is a certain model, template, a plant or flower. Water and sunlight fill the model with life, and at the same time both water and sunlight are just vessels with power, just like the flower, but the flower suddenly begins to identify itself with water. And claims that all other water is directly connected to it, which would mean that this very flower is present everywhere there is other water, as if the flower is life itself.
Try to question the reality of your ‘I’, what if it is just a chemical reaction, of water and photosynthesis, a temporary reaction, what if your stream of consciousness is outside of you. All your perceptual ability has been tuned; in the process of life, you feel, you think, but the feelings and thoughts have an external source, some abstract substance that uniquely binds into ‘I’, providing the wonderful reaction that is called personality. ‘I’ is not something static, it is merely a process, evolving and improving, but still remains just a dynamic. And the process is a temporary phenomenon, which will someday simply end.
Mental games “what if” have long ceased to interest me. I start from facts – there is consciousness. What can I do practically so that “I” (whatever that may be) feel better? And that’s it. The flower is there, the water, what does it matter.
A strange architecture in the comments; I actually addressed the message not to you, esteemed German, but to someone Tao, resonating with the comment he wrote above, but since he commented on you in his message, my remark reached you. Personally, I also wrote to you today, reacting to your message about focusing attention on breathing. I had no intention of criticizing you and provoking rudeness. Fearing a similar reaction to the message already personally addressed to you, I take the liberty to apologize in advance if I may have upset your practical mindset.
It would be an honor to be offered!
I would not call it rudeness but straightforwardness, but I do not insist. It’s just that behind beautiful words on the internet there is often no practical experience, and I want to cut through all this ‘spiritual’ nonsense and discuss practical issues.
I had a state where I felt like a point that encompasses everything around, feels every tree, person regardless of distance, the planet, and goes into cosmic infinity. What is outside turned out to be inside. Could I feel infinity if I were not a point? But at the same time, am I a point if I encompass infinity?
And a few quotes from my reflections, so that you understand me better. “””You are the inner world, and therefore the outer, you are pure consciousness without a body, an observer, a point and infinity at the same time, and you are something inner that hides in the darkness and observes you, which is perceived as an enemy, because it wants to destroy you. You are all of this and even an illusion. Because the illusion is that part of you that leads to you…..”””
I am tired of dividing myself into points, but how do I come to know myself? All my fullness? Fullness, which is Depth.
“””The outer world is also perceived as an illusion – a mask, this is just an outer layer, but what is beneath it? Previously, I thought that there is the essence, but now I am not sure about that. And maybe it is yet another illusion, another mask? How many of these depths, these layers can there be?….”””Where, after all, is reality? Every reality is real as long as you find yourself within it, but which one to choose as more real?…”
“”””(Something) calls me from beyond the border, from the threshold. The threshold of eternity?
Calls to “step beyond the threshold”? But can you step beyond infinity? Part becomes whole, and then the whole becomes a part, and then again, becoming whole becomes a part…
I observe this endless recursion of cosmic depth from within, and at that moment, a slightly elusive butterfly sits on my shoulder….”””
Of course, I understand that these are only words. Words will never replace sensations. “The more you feel, the less you want to speak” However, in the reality of this sight, how will I convey myself if not in words?)))
In the comment to the last post, you specifically spoke about separation from me, and that you cannot understand me. I am not an abstract flower or water, and at the same time “any human being.”
Do not be upset – everything is ahead, Maria) If you mean the previous topic about Amaymon, then the reason for the misunderstanding was cognitive distortions. At that time, the psychic experience I described above was unconscious, concerning only my elements of the psyche – internal reality (and perhaps was a projection of some more global processes). However, as you can see – I have not gotten out of the Wheel of Samsara and am still here because it does not go beyond the psyche; moreover, I am not sitting in a psychiatric hospital because of the breakthrough of the unconscious, because these phenomena do not occur 24 hours a day, although I find it difficult to ignore them. I am currently sitting at a table and holding a phone; somehow, I do not feel like a Divine consciousness. As for understanding – why am I writing here? I hope there are people who share similar experiences and thoughts with me. Why do I read other people’s messages and react to them? I want to check my thoughts, improve them, and possibly adopt others if mine lose relevance. A thought is relevant and written now; with time, it may become irrelevant for me. To understand you… do I need to tune in to you through messages? To which area does your understanding relate, and to which the experience I described?
The message was without a concrete address by nickname; I apologize if it was not addressed to me.
Achieving unity by imputing it to someone else or excluding something from reality (“demons”, they are cognitive distortions, in other people) has never succeeded anyone at all.
To renounce one’s psychic experience? To fight with these effects, dreams, to ignore…
I think it resembles a koan. On the one hand, it does not become a means of strengthening the myth of another (listener, perceiver, opponent, object of manipulation – any consciousness that pays attention without relying on its own nature and love), and on the other – it doesn’t do the opposite. So what remains…(this is not a question for those who know how to live, who I am and where I should go, this is a koan)
“So your ‘I’ is real, while the rest of the world is not?”
I never said that this I – is my self.
It says “one I”, “different selves”.
Please read more carefully.
I don’t have time to reason, I just say it as it is.
Each individual ya is a source of living light. All other sources related to it can be separated, and what remains is that very same it for every living being. It always remains. Ya is the primary luminosity.
(it is called individuality in this blog)
Teo, if “ya” is the source of light, can it be light? If abstractly, the Sun is a source of light, but in reality this light comes from the process of burning, the element of fire.
For me, the source of all is the process occurring with darkness (or in darkness). Moreover, I recently read in a Muslim description of hell that Darkness has a property to burn. And the souls of sinners burn in dark fire. But this same fire is something divine (purifying, where sins crackle and burn). The duality of fire 🙂 . However, I pondered about the model under our noses based on the principle of hermetism “That which is above is analogous to that which is below.” About the visible source (before our eyes), to which the invisible can be applied 🙂
You can step away from Consciousness and refer to quantum physics as an example. There is a book “The Structure of Reality” by D. Deutsch, chapter “Shadows”. It describes an experiment with light. If briefly (from my perspective)… There is a single ray, a beam of light directed from a point into space (although, no – you can draw a parallel with Consciousness) :). We cannot see it until the wave of light hits an obstacle – a reflective surface. Moreover, the ray of light expands (the flashlight experiment) to illuminate a larger surface, but as it expands, it becomes dimmer since the photons move further apart. The experiment then boils down to the difference in the perception of light by the human eye and to the more sensitive eye of a frog. In theory and accessible instrumental research, as the frog moves away from the light source, the light would not begin to disappear for it, but would start to flicker, and the further the frog moves away from the light source, the longer the interval between flickering would pass, but the flashes would not be less bright for that. Quantization occurs. And the question arises. The frog does not see the light because it does not hit its retina (while the flashlight shines just as it did). Where is the light at the moment (in the interval between flickering)? To answer this question, the author examines the boundary between light and shadow, the gray area named penumbra. He conducts an experiment with the distortion of light, placing an obstacle with holes in its path and it turns out that light resists limitation, yet is then scattered in different ways, yielding different rings of thickness and brightness, and also a photon consists of different colors, which also introduces its corrections. (As far as I know, the matrix(es) are also barriers with holes, such Universal hives through which waves of light from Universal consciousness pass) :). Further, there is an experiment with shadow, illustrations, and other things that I will not describe, but I will make some excerpts. “The shadow picture from a partition with four slits, depicted in figure 2.7 (a), only appears if all four slits are illuminated by a laser beam. If only two slits are illuminated, a picture appears corresponding to the shadow of the two slits. If three slits are illuminated, a picture will appear from the shadow of three slits, which in turn will differ from the previous two. Thus, something in the light beam causes interference. The shadow picture from the two slits also appears if the two slits are filled with light-blocking material, but it is altered when filling those slits with a transparent material. In other words, interference is hindered by something that obstructs light, which can even be something as insubstantial as mist. But it can pass through everything that lets light through…” This Something behaves like Light. The author has called this Something – invisible photons, and the photons of light – real. “We can see or detect the first with instruments, while the second – are intangible (invisible): they can only be detected indirectly through their influence on visible photons. (Further we will see that there is no particular difference between real and shadow photons: each photon is tangible in one Universe and intangible in all parallel Universes — but I am getting ahead of events).” In general, the only instrument that can currently observe parallel worlds is us ourselves, as Shadow – shadow particle, only affects us, but its effect on others we do not see (while we are in the real world).
I love to write a lot:) what I wanted – I’ve written. Further, you can think about the question “where does the light go during flickering?” 🙂
Do parts of consciousness of Enmerkar have consciousness? Depending on what we mean by “the consciousness of Enmerkar”, the psyche, including consciousness, has a kaleidoscope of elements. I cannot peer into parallel worlds, although my unconscious is trying to draw me into this adventure (just kidding). However, I sometimes have a feeling that some parts of me are in other people. Not somewhere in a parallel universe, but in one matrix, in this Universe – one could say, we are from the same ray. And nothing! These parts live, these parts are not me (“I” is still personal, purely mine in this incarnation), but we are to some extent common.
There is also an example of astral vision. Usually, we look and see only one side of an object, while in the astral there is such an ability when you see an object from all sides at once. Perhaps someone present here has experienced this. Then in the awareness of the facets of reality, regardless of its geometry, there will be a more understandable approach.
I also recall about Fate, that we choose it before incarnation. So, it turns out my I took everything into account from its lines and personally placed me on one of them. The hierarchy of consciousness – I do not possess the consciousness of that I that sent me here, but that I possesses my consciousness – I am its part, but it is not me. After all, in essence, I and the higher I have different realities.
Such thoughts. They only need to be brought to a common root. To the seed. So that “bam!” and that’s it – I understood.
The concept of 3-dimensional space time is more productive than many alternative worlds, although it does not exclude such a possibility, for who will measure the infinitude?
It contains within it all possible ways of becoming and destruction for any grain (a kind of universal form). This is the unchanging reality in relation to our ever-changing universe. In other words – this is Truth and Light.
From this 3-dimensional space of Light, a ‘ray’ is emitted, which ‘falls’ into the three-dimensional space of matter and merging with it causes the differentiation of the primary substance and the formation of the cosmos in the 4-dimensional space-time that we know.
alexsid.. are you interested in time? Then ask the Forces of Direction of time about them. Don’t know how? Then just ask.
I read everything, from Enmerkar’s note to the last comment from the “guests.” The feeling is mixed … Some things are close and understandable, while others are from the realm of “mental fluctuations.” I made a conclusion for myself: One should not forget basic truths:
1). “Everything perfect is simple, and vice versa …”.
Evolution is the development of consciousness, and the development of everything else follows after. Consciousness is awareness of one’s essence, the surrounding world, and the system that creates it, which must constantly expand, be questioned, specified, and … simplified.
2). “Everything is known through comparison.” For this, it is necessary to constantly learn about the consciousness of other evolutionary subjects, including those that have advanced far ahead and with which one can interact exclusively using different methods and practices, the main of which is meditation, whereas others, including Tarot Arcana, Runes, etc. – are auxiliary but also helpful, albeit imperfect systems of obtaining information, as they help train abstract-intuitive thinking.
3). “One should not attempt to ’embrace the ungraspable’. Everything has its time. When consciousness expands to certain boundaries, all that is hidden will become manifest by itself, as the need to use the knowing intellect will fall away, replaced by that which can be conditionally referred to as sensing knowledge, which in ancient times was called wisdom.
Summary:
I ask all who read my comment to humbly excuse me for the forced reasoning and thank you for your attention to my thoughts. It is reassuring and comforting to know that not all empathetic people, thinking in the Light, have yet gone extinct, which means I am not alone. :)))
That’s why it can sometimes be so difficult to make a choice. As long as the choice is not made, both realities exist—the one that is now and the one that is in potential.
Oohhh!!!