Hierarchy of the Logoi
Let us recall that the Myth we describe regards manifested existence as a process of self-knowledge of Absolute Reality, through differentiation within it an infinite number of potentials and their actualization in the binary — knowable potentials and the knowing mind. At the same time we have argued that any binary is, in fact, a ternary, since, besides the “positive” and the “negative”, a “neutral” element is present. Hence the world-process is described as the result of the interpenetration of three components: the striving to know (Monads), the striving to be known (energies) and the very act of knowing (the Logoi).
From the standpoint of the manifested, ‘realizing’ mind, both Monads and energies exist in potential reality, and the differentiation of discrete energies from the single homogeneous world-substrate under the influence of the Monads’ knowing activity proceeds according to the general logic of the unfolding of mind — forming the hierarchy of the Logoi.
In other words, the Logoi are scenarios of realization, or, as one might say, the principle of form of a given object or process. By “form” we mean the manifested individuality itself, the ensemble of distinguishing traits of that object or process. The Logos is the highest expression of that principle, while its concrete manifestations — ideas (“eidos”) and models (“Me“) — generate the full diversity of manifestations.
The hierarchy of the Logoi permeates all layers of the cosmos, constituting the “guiding vectors” of its development. How precisely the development of an object or the course of a process corresponds to its Logos determines the efficiency of that development. Yet one mustn’t assume that the Logos is “fate” or “predestination” that renders development unfree. The Logos is precisely a “logic”, the inner core of development, leading a being or a process toward its full and perfect realization by the shortest route. A being, an object or a process may follow its Logos to varying degrees, and there is no coercion in following it. It is merely a matter of developmental efficiency. The Logos is the force that shows how far a being or process is from its “ideal state” and thereby paves the way to that state.
From the Universal Logos down to the differential Logoi of elementary events, the world is suffused with “meaning”, a “dream” of future perfection. The world “dreams” of becoming God, and that dream is its Logos. The mystic aspires to deification, and that aspiration is a Logos.
The force that calls an individual being to development — manifesting to it as the “Higher Self”, HGA, or the personal Idam, the force indicating the Orlög of the individual Way — is that being’s Logos. The force that makes a human human, that determines the human form and manifests as the “Universal Man”, Adam, is the Human Logos. The force that unifies a planet, bringing life into a single symphony, is the Logos of that planet. The force that underlies the creative activity of the gods, directing their creative and generative actions into the single current of the world-process, is the Logos of the gods, the God-creator in the monotheistic sense. The force that makes a stone a stone, a grain of sand a grain of sand, a mountain a mountain, and even sustains the fleeting existence of a wave on the ocean’s surface — these are the Logoi of those forms of existence.
Smaller Logoi combine into larger ones and so on, up to the ideal Logos of the Universe. The hierarchy of the Logoi runs parallel to the hierarchy of Vortices; however, if the collectivities of vortices are individualized “from the bottom up” — that is, any egregoric vortex is born of the individual vortices that compose it — then the hierarchy of the Logoi unfolds “from the top down”, each Logos of a lower order resulting from the differentiation of a Logos of a higher degree of synthesis.
The Logoi are the “ideal result” of each specific act of the Absolute’s self-knowledge, the “model” of the full penetration of the Monad’s mind into the potential field of its qualities and energies, the complete actualization of that field of potentials. Since time exists only from the viewpoint of manifested existence, on the level of Spirit there is no time, and, from the Great Spirit’s own standpoint, it is simultaneously potential and actual, unmanifest and manifest, one and differentiated; thus the Logoi are at once the Way and the result of the world’s process of knowing.
Understanding and finding the “ideal state” — the Logos of a system — enables a system to realize its potentials as rapidly and efficiently as possible, and thus reduces its tension and dissatisfaction.





It’s all true!
Enmerkar informs wonderfully; it’s like a cleared info channel.
I’m impressed.
The binary is a Turner in the aspect of integral unity – the unity of the knowable and the knowing beginnings in knowledge itself. At the same time, if we consider the specified Turner from the point of view of unity in multiplicity, we acquire a quaternity – where the unifying beginning is the Great Spirit, encompassing the knowable beginning, the knowing beginning, and the process of knowing itself.
Any binary is a source of energy. The neutralization of a binary leads to integral unity and directional realization of the energy embedded in the binary. Integration in the multiplicity of the binary leads to the cyclical supersystem of higher-order realization.
In general, if the specified quaternity is presented as an ankh, then the right and left wings of the ankh are the binary, the descending part is the neutralization of the binary (the energy of integral unity), the ascending circular arc is the potentialization of the binary (the energy of unity in multiplicity).
The practical significance of the obtained quaternity is hard to overestimate. A magician at the center of the ankh, maintaining BALANCE, gains the ability to utilize the power embedded in the binary, both in the aspect of its directional neutralization and embodiment in the form of the synthesis of opposites, and in the aspect of their integration in multiplicity and obtaining supersystem realisms uniting both beginnings in interaction without neutralization.
This is especially important considering that such supersystem realizations are multivalent and much broader than simple neutralization. Thus, the integration in the multiplicity of the binary fire-water represents the majority of earthly life forms and a significant part of minerals, while its neutralization may only be a stream of steam turned into a cloud.
Does the hierarchy of logoi exist initially and in its entirety, or is it augmented by the active activity of consciousness?
It is incorrect to use the word “exists” in relation to logoi, as logois are thoughts, highest ideas, abstract plans for the structure of an entity, object, or process, and not something independent or tangible. However, it is also incorrect to say that they “appear” during the work of consciousness; they only direct and organize this work.
I am intrigued by Plato’s philosophy. According to his logic, the highest idea/logos is the GOOD, from which other logos are hierarchically differentiated. In your opinion, what is the ‘highest’ idea?? It would be interesting to see how one logos (idea) gives rise to another logos (idea). I understand that logical reasoning and the discipline of logic may help here?
I think what Plato meant by ‘the Good’ can today be called ‘existence,’ that is – ‘manifestation in harmony with oneself and with others.’
…’any egregoreal vortex is born from the individual vortices that comprise it, so the hierarchy of Logoi unfolds ‘from top to bottom,’ and each lower-order logos is a birth, the result of differentiation of a higher degree of synthetic logos.’ Is this the division of a higher idea into simpler ones? Please explain.
I have just gone through the period where I was learning to attune to my own power. That is, I conceive something and wait for feedback. And I feel either denial, or positivity, or uncertainty regarding the upcoming action. At the same time, I try to determine when dissatisfaction with actions is connected with properties of the forces and it needs to be overcome (to show determination), and when there is an impression of being told: no, don’t do that; it will lead to something bad. I don’t know how to explain this; perhaps it’s somehow related to the inner understanding of my Logos.