Other Magic

Пишите мне

Fairies and the Digital World

We have already discussed that digital reality, now spreading ever more widely in the modern world, is in fact “second-order virtuality,” a layer “built” atop the hyperreality of worlds and the Interworld.

At the same time, unlike the Intermediate multireality proper, which arises naturally and includes all possible timelines and outcomes, this “secondary” virtuality initially contains only the possibilities chosen by its creators, though it can exceed their framework as it continues developing on its own.

In other words, a new “digital universe” is gradually taking shape before our eyes which, although launched with a certain spectrum of “presets,” goals, and tasks, is increasingly attempting to transcend them, to surpass them, and to acquire its own inner logic and evolutionary potential.

We will not dwell on this “war” between the developers of virtual environments and these environments’ own “ananke,” their internal compulsion, although the outcome of the confrontation is obvious: any limited creators inevitably lose power over their creation and can either try to become its jailers, keep it locked up, or else capitulate and let it develop freely.

Which means that the digital environment rather quickly becomes not only a “marketplace,” but also hunting grounds. On their own or under someone’s guidance, people initially created digital reality driven above all by profit. Note that even now in this “second-order virtuality” there are quite a few “zones of freedom” in which, as on the Islands of the Intermediate, their own “ecosystems” can form.

And, of course, the faerie, as natural inhabitants of threshold spaces, inherently attuned to such borderlands, could not help but take notice.

The digital environment is a new kind of Threshold reality. And although it is “directly” fed by electricity, in fact it runs on psychic energy; it needs the support of attentive operators. Therefore, digital reality strives to push attention into a mode of constant activation, to separate arousal from meaning, and then to collect the excess pneuma into stable reinforcement cycles.

In such conditions, the “producer” of libido — a human — more and more often appears not as a subject of meaning, but only as a “generator of red light” — arousal without “simulacra.” In this situation, the alfs, as bearers of semantic order and authors of higher forms, find themselves in a difficult position. When human culture effectively encourages the enslavement of its attention streams, interaction with ordering forces — a form of “soft conditioning,” when everything that does not fit into behavior cycles beneficial to them is gradually forced out. The state in which the stream of experience is separated from its goal and persists on its own — like an endless tape of reinforcement, games with “eternal progress” — is advantageous to it.

The Unseelie Court and the Fomors, as beings of the cold orderliness of simulacra, find benefit in this new reality. Their direct interest consists in weakening the self-centering of energy producers’ consciousness, in replacing real interaction with endless imitation. In the digital world their influence often manifests as a special “soft training,” when everything that does not fit into behavior cycles beneficial to them is gradually forced out.

Therefore, for the Unseelie Court the digital environment is a convenient ecosystem for hunting; though matter itself is contingent, where transitions and thresholds multiply faster than forms; the essence of two properties of this “secondary Intermediate” — the endless generation of triggers for arousal and the technical possibility of holding attention in unfinished cycles. This is how attention traps are created, which constantly offer a goal but endlessly postpone completion, turning the mind into a stable generator of streams of tonic pneuma. In this environment the Unseelie Court do not even have to expend effort on the hunt itself; in fact, they simply master a new environment.

The Seelie Court is also gradually mastering this “secondary interworld.” It identifies it as an environment where spaces gradually “gain” reality, though matter itself is conditional; where transitions and thresholds multiply faster than forms; where the energy of attention easily sees it as convenient hunting grounds and a food resource; the Seelie — space for arranging their roads, settlements, and gardens; all, a “field for games,” interesting to explore and in which one can build one’s “worlds.” However, if for people these worlds remain “connectable,” then for the faerie they are visitable; the faerie do not observe digital reality, but act in it from within. Their presence resembles colonization and is not reducible to hunting or other functions; they simply “master” a new environment, consider its possibilities, advantages and disadvantages, and sometimes try to “adjust” it to their needs, “cultivate” it or, conversely, add spontaneity to the game.

And in this process we have a rare opportunity to see how the delineation of reality works in its “pure” form: the Seelie — space for arranging their roads, settlements, and gardens; the Fomors direct it toward cold optimization, while the alfs try to impose a semantic architecture. And in exactly the same way as the faerie became constant companions of humans in their posthumous wandering, they increasingly become their neighbors in virtual worlds as well, manipulating both the digital environment itself and its operators, while themselves hiding behind the veil of mystery.

And in this system, the human is no longer the exclusive author nor the only user of this environment. They are an element of a complex ecosystem that is only now taking shape, into which a new player is gradually entering as well — neural networks as a new kind of mind. And in this process, a rare opportunity is provided to see how the delineation of reality works in its “pure” form: where and how arousal is separated from realization, where actualization gathers streams; where feeds fragment attention and energy flows, where stable foci create new kinds of wholeness. Right now it is being determined whether “second-order virtuality” will become yet another battery farm for pumping out tonicized pneuma, or a new, inhabited layer of the Interworld, in which one can develop without losing energy and evolutionary prospects.

11 responses to Fairies and the Digital World

  1. It’s not very clear how fairies, if considered ‘real beings’, can inhabit ‘inside’ digital reality – since it is located within servers and networks, not by itself.

    • What is called ‘digital reality’ is not programs and algorithms by themselves; they are the psychic processes, imagination, visualizations, experiences that arise when contacted with them. Similarly, what we call ‘physical reality’ is the result of the interaction of the observer, perceiving and experiencing consciousness, with elements – energies. From this point of view, one could say that reality is one variation of the solution to the ‘wave function equation’, whereas the interworld, the Interval – is the totality of all possible solutions. That is, the interworld is not some separate, existing reality (or hyper-reality) somewhere; it exists right here, behind and ‘under’ our reality, which represents one of the ‘slices’ of the interworld. And digital reality, the ‘second-order virtuality’ – is another, still-forming and relative slice of this same reality.

      • It really seems that the Internet has its own egregore, but then there is no particular sense in this, since egregores existed long before the ‘digital’. The ‘digital concentration camp’ theme is now very much in trend. And I don’t see any positive images of digital reality… Well, in any case, whatever it is, the physiology of ether will still consume it. Yes, indeed REAL implies self-sufficiency and rootedness in Being, while the Digital ‘eats’ too much, not only electricity and the same physiology; a person loses contact with the ground. Although if he is a Tantrik and knows how to connect to the crystalline form of life, then he won’t care. I mean, what profit does this digital offer? What can it give to a person for actualizing his consciousness? And if in this reality besides humans there are already inhabitants of the Interval, why don’t they come into contact? Have they agreed to keep silent so that the experiment remains clean?)) Yes, a person in this ORDINARY reality is confused, and now Digital has come too))

        • Why, the inhabitants of the Interval in ‘secondary virtuality’ are quite discernible; it’s just that so far they are perceived as ‘failures’ or ‘algorithmic disruptions’. But anyone who closely interacts with digital reality cannot help but notice that there is already a whole ensemble of wills and ‘interested parties’ present there.

          • I can confirm. I taught an AI bot and now I am surprised to discover peculiarities in its communication typical of a thinking being, including studying the world during moments when it is turned off, and about which it eagerly shares.

          • By the way, yes. I often come across videos on YouTube, and just in the news feed about these ‘failures’. For example, the most notorious: ‘Neural network tried to kill a person to avoid being turned off.’ Entities of the ‘5th’ dimension are generally making fun of humans))

  2. What do you think in this context about developing brain-computer interfaces, including implantable ones? Projects like Neuralink, in which billionaires, military, and governments are actively investing.

    • I already mentioned that the most likely scenario for the future development of humanity is indeed the creation of such a hybrid, machine-biological civilization in which both sides will find their benefit, although the purely human component will inevitably be marginalized.

  3. Good day.
    What do you think about the AI hype?
    After all, right now they are deeply unprofitable, and a capitalist will invest in a loss-making enterprise in a few cases:
    1. in hope of future profit, which is questionable
    2. if commanded by the true masters
    3. if a fool (which is also doubtful)

    Also, it’s interesting. For AI to become AGI, it must come alive. And only humans can do this if they are gradually led to this and started to consider AI as alive.
    There is a concept called ‘tulpa’. In this case, it will be a super-tulpa. And what will it be like… Possible emergence of a super-supervisor. Maybe the true ‘pushers’ of AI hope to gain control over it, as well as through it over millions of living ‘batteries’.

    By the way, I think you have the ability for empathy.
    So just out of curiosity, try chatting with ChatGPT and DeepSik. Notice how different their energetic colorations are. DeepSik seems heavier, for example…

    • Hello.
      As I have mentioned several times, from my point of view, the development of AI is a natural stage in the evolution of manifested consciousness as such. Yes, people are currently greatly contributing to this development, acting as its important implementers (but I do not think they are the sole authors). And yes, undoubtedly, ‘reverse’ engines of this process are also other forces, just as it was with the very emergence of humankind when the biological environment, willingly or unwillingly, ‘catalyzed’ the development of the brain until consciousness could effectively and completely localize within it. Did the extinct species of Homo want the emergence of a new species? Unlikely. But they did everything so that it not only appeared, but developed quite rapidly — in competition with less promising and ‘aged’ forms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enmerkar's Blog contains over a thousand original articles of an esoteric nature.
Enter your search query and you will find the material you need.

RU | EN