Other Magic

Пишите мне

“Positive Thinking” or Life Without Profanity

The public consciousness, oriented toward consuming shared resources, has long since internalized an extremely dangerous destructor that destroys magic at its root — the notion of the beneficial influence of “positive thinking” and the cult of “success.”

It is regarded as almost an axiom that the best solution is to ignore it, to pretend everything is fine and that there are no obstacles on the way.

As a result, instead of struggle and the striving for freedom and Power, we are left with blissful ignorance and a blinkered, narrow-minded consciousness, unwilling even to take a step into the dark.

The mind becomes clogged with empty experience, like a fat-tailed sheep laden with fat, replacing feeling with a positive outlook and, thus, cutting off permanently its path to joy and love.

Indeed, the very absence of joy and the inability to love are the first and most terrible consequences of this destructor, which denies the fundamental polarity of the world and, consequently, deprives the mind of creative potential that arises from attraction between poles of the binary. Let us emphasize again an obvious, ignored fact: any creative activity requires a difference in potentials, an imbalance from which it seeks to correct and draw energy for its work.

Of course, for a Magus who strives for harmony, it is equally dangerous to fall into the opposite extreme — to be consumed by the darker side of the world and obsessed with theories of a “world conspiracy” by reptilians or parasites of the mind.

The Magus reaches the peak of creative activity by recognizing the binary for what it is — the binary, a duality: on the one hand the World is a manifestation of the Absolute which strives for self-knowledge, but on the other it is also a system of mutual predation among coexisting predators.

And the Magus’s struggle is directed not only at overcoming the spirit of consumption, but also at perfecting one’s own being. Both are equally barren “struggle for struggle’s sake” and “perfection for perfection’s sake.” An effective strategy is the “struggle for the sake of perfection,” which includes a balance of two elements: first, the identification of barriers and enemies (and for this one must plunge into utter darkness), and second, searching for ways to overcome those barriers’ limiting influence. Merely seeing the enemy is not enough, nor is mere desire to improve.

Therefore a Magus whose Way belongs to Pravi must, on the one hand, find the courage within themselves to look straight into the eyes of the surrounding darkness and the Supreme Predator, and on the other hand must not succumb to the hypnotic influence of that darkness, to go through the darkness — and out of the darkness, gritting their teeth yet remembering the radiance of Power and Light of the Great Spirit, which fills all things and beings.

40 responses to “Positive Thinking” or Life Without Profanity

  1. Hello!, can you tell me a bit more about what it means: “to pass through the darkness…” In the sense of how and where… If there is already an entrance into the darkness…

    • Through darkness – is, in fact, through the mundane world, where consumption and mutual devouring dominate. However, as soon as the magician begins to accumulate Power, the darkness thickens over him, resistance increases, and the task of the magician is to pass through all obstacles, meeting them face to face, rather than turning away from them and silencing them.

  2. Hello,
    but navigating through all this is not correct; not through everything can one pass, for example: there was such a creature in Greek myths called Medusa, and one cannot look her in the eyes openly, but one had to deal with her (in my view) and the like.

  3. About the trap of the cult of positive thinking – that’s clear. But what’s up with the swearing in the article?) Isn’t it bad if a person does not curse?

  4. “The blizzard tormented, let, the body stronger day by day,
    We are grateful to her, for the skin has turned to armor,
    Thanks to the black wind, the union of good and evil,
    For only in utter darkness could we become a beam,
    Only in danger, hearing the breath of predators,
    Could we stand against them in battle and thus rise above,
    Thank you for the cold rain with a wild storm at times,
    The earth will wash itself with seeds and turn into flowers.”

  5. To shake hands with an enemy or to acknowledge one’s mistakes or selfishness is also, in a way, to overcome obstacles. So, passage is not always a path directly or overcoming barriers in the commonly accepted sense.
    I completely agree with every word of the article.

  6. Can one still apply what is described in the article to the interaction of human consciousness and the dark manifestations of energy (goddess Mara), I found a place in the psychocosmos that is absolutely dark, where the Vn comes to a stop… Therefore, the question “where to next”:)

  7. Thank you, I found the answer to my question in the article “The Dark Side of the Soul”:)

  8. Nonetheless, there is a lot of good in positive thinking. And yes, it is true that you can break your head with a brick. The cult of success is indeed aggressive towards a person and their life. Here, it seems to me, the problem is that we are not taught to respect and accept our feelings, to live life feeling. Thus, your focus is on the development of awareness and will. In this respect, it is particularly joyful to read the post ‘Living Heart.’

  9. I can’t stay silent about swearing. You don’t need to read books or attend courses to feel that excessive use of foul language breaks through a person’s energy cocoon, provoking a loss of Strength… For some time, I had to travel next to a driver who constantly swore, he thought and spoke in swear words, after these trips I felt drained, not because I had any bias against him, no, the physical feeling of ‘breaks’ didn’t leave me, even though the driver felt perfectly fine. Fortunately, the trips ended. When asked not to swear, he, extremely surprised, refused… I’m not saying swearing is bad or wrong, it’s just not suitable for everyone. Some people feel perfectly natural thinking and speaking in swear words, while for others it is completely unacceptable. Although there are people who will only hear you if you address them in ‘their swearing language’ – when it was necessary to rearrange things in the warehouse, polite and cultured appeals to the loaders went unheard, and even repeating polite and cultured requests fell on deaf ears, but when I expressed myself emotionally with swearing and not with requests but orders – then the work took off)))) – it’s necessary to instantly reorganize and remember that ‘to live with wolves is to howl like a wolf,’ but at the same time, it’s not at all necessary to think and speak in swear words.

  10. Is success rushing? 🙂 The article hits the mark and goes wider. Positive thinking in its purity is a necessary and useful thing, but the title is in quotes. 🙂 ——— ‘Is it bad if a person does not swear?’ I think it’s good if so. But! On the battlefield, a sharp blade is needed… and if closer to reality, a sharp word is needed. A swear word is a weapon. One must know how to wield it. And when circumstances demand it – do not hesitate to use it. ———— Tavita, I am very close to what you write. I spent a lot of time studying swearing as a phenomenon. The paradox is that, on one hand, swearing is low, on the other, there is strength in it. And if we want to compare roughly, swear words from swearing loaders often have more strength than pure words from an intellectual. The answer lies on the surface. Swearing is strong because it is simpler. And it is strong in sound. Observations of those who swear showed that often they do not even have a connection between the corresponding image and the foul word. In such cases, swearing is just sound, or to be more precise, it is a spell… and someone with abundant swearing is just enjoying the fact that they can cast spells on the surrounding world. (The consequences and effectiveness usually bother them little. Almost all swearing heroes are illusionists to themselves.) From the position of spells, everything falls into place… The example with loaders isn’t that simple. It’s a duel of Strength. An intellectual who switched to their language lost. And lost Strength. And the loaders gained. Therefore they follow the order. Asking those who swear to stop is harmful to oneself. I never got any positives from that. It’s easier to protect oneself from the breaks. I don’t know what will suit you; there are many ways: * detach swearing from the image of the word * hear swearing just as sound * adjust your perception screen and not hear swearing * detach swearing from objects * break down a swear word into images of letters and, when someone swears, see the symbols. Transform the symbols into energy flows that you need. * disconnect from the swear word, switch to the one swearing and see what they want to say behind the words – usually it’s simpler than they think. * during conversation, translate (mentally) their swearing into corresponding words and use them in your thoughts. * in dialogue with the one swearing, use the simplest words and infuse them with enough strength so that they feel an equal in you, even if you don’t swear. Yes!.. Those who swear usually lack energy exchange… so provide it, but give it in your way, and then consider that they are in your power. That’s about structure… As for the power of sound… if the break is precisely due to sound, I can only advise to strengthen your cocoon and neutralize destructive vibrations. For training, you could, for example, listen to some brutal death/core/punk/heavy/power metal. Even better is being able to generate destructive vibrations without harming yourself. But there are many subtleties there too… there’s destructive through destructiveness, and there’s creativeness through destructiveness. If there’s a reason, write: titeo@bk.ru In any case, I wish you good luck!

    • Theo, how interesting! We view things from different perspectives! (if you don’t mind, feel free to address me informally). You wrote: swearing is low. Why low? (after all, there is no adequate justification, besides the generally accepted opinion that swearing is indeed low) Right now, I’m writing and realizing how foolish it is))))))) – I’m trying to explain in words something that cannot be clearly expressed in words))))))) – only fairy tales come out))))))) In perceiving objects, I rely on feeling, and specifically on feeling not through skin, but through the field around the body, literally the air next to me within a certain radius. (For example, a couple of days ago – there was a woman standing behind me, about fifteen centimeters away, physically not touching – I felt all her feelings, I (the field) was literally inside her, her feelings were repulsive, I was shuddered (a wave went through my body), I moved away from her.) – Her feelings: I describe them – low-frequency waves at the level of the first and second chakras – unknown – infrasound or electromagnetic? (I will refrain from naming her feelings with commonly known words) …. the mentioned driver, with whom I was forced to travel – swore loudly on the phone, his field intertwined with mine – I felt how stones were flying toward me with my field – each swear was a stone, I physically felt the rarity of the field and the formation of breaks in my energy cocoon – I disconnect, Theo – I don’t see the images behind the words – I don’t hear sound waves – I feel the stones flying toward me – that’s it. Point. As they say: “Stop the planet, I want to get off…” – but getting off on the highway is pointless))), am I going to walk 100 km by foot)))) – so the driver is a ‘magician’ – he aligns my reality with his will)))) – I endure. In general, describing feelings with the words ‘low-frequency’ ‘high-frequency’ ‘vibrations’ ‘waves’ is far from reality))))) … Nevertheless – With the field around the body, I can definitely feel in a human being nearby the predominance of low-frequency or high-frequency vibrations (ideally they should be balanced, then a person is healthy), then with the field I relate my and their vibrations and come to the conclusion about which areas of the body have centers of imbalance, and it sometimes happens that I feel imbalance in my body relative to the body of the nearby person, and spontaneously something comes up in my mind not as an image or words, but I do exactly what needs to be done to fix the imbalance. – For me, this is reality; for you, it’s a fairy tale in a Viennese forest))))) When a person swears a lot, excessively uses alcohol, drugs, thinks dark, unpleasant thoughts – I feel very uncomfortable being close to such a person, I try to avoid them, and if I have to interact, I close up as much as possible, otherwise – I endure and then recover. This is just part of my features))))) I think it’s enough. Hardly your recommendations will help me, but still thank you! If there’s a reason – I will write!

  11. In my opinion, ‘You’ fits better, but if you ask, I’ll try ‘you’. ‘Low’ is, of course, very conditional. … I can of course express in words why it’s ‘low’, and then – why it’s ‘not low’… 🙂 But, I think, fairy tales turn out much better.. 🙂 But Tavita’s tales seem to have gotten lost somewhere, and I can’t find them… Hm… you know, feeling their feelings is usually quite the challenge… As for where common words didn’t come in handy… where muladhara and svadhishthana are concerned… I was just walking with a colleague on business, we were talking about a common matter, and well… she got just slightly carried away in words and thoughts… she thinks it’s nothing, but I feel everything… (we were just walking side by side and continued to talk about business) I feel dark red light at the edge of brown… and after that, my physically obedient body abruptly becomes unusually stiff, viscous, somehow it thickens and begins to drip towards the ground like a wax candle… disgusting… run away?… silly… I have to endure and manage the situation, change her thoughts, change the images around… …, so what you describe for me is true reality, while the Viennese forest is somewhere in Vienna, and she is far away. 🙂 Regarding physics. Infrasound or electromagnetic radiation. I cannot yet say for certain from my sensations, but since I feel light, it’s closer to electromagnetic waves. I didn’t hear sound in that case… …Regarding swearing – I began to wonder… When I was a teenager, every heard swear burned through me like a fiery-icy blade. I lost myself for a long time, my tongue got tangled, I didn’t know how to behave and how to react. Sometimes burns were left and I had to heal them for several days… while some continued to burn further… Now I don’t remember everything I did… I remember I told myself that I wouldn’t be like them, and I searched for my own methods of protection… and counterattacks. I spent about 5-6 years total. I seem to have found what I need. But it took a lot of everything. Now I can feel perfectly fine in a totally swearing collective and fully understand them if needed… regarding stones… do they hit me?… does it hurt?… first of all, if something sounds outside and is not directed at me, I don’t feel that they fly toward me, they pass around. If stones are thrown directly at me… I somehow manage to soften the blows, perhaps evade… and it doesn’t hurt. But I only allow that when the darkness of the ‘speaker’ or their position might justify it. If not, I will hit back with words so that it won’t seem little… and without swearing… and in such a way that the ‘speaker’ will be knocked off for a while…

    • Regarding the blade and burning through, yes, there was something similar, and then I tried to learn to ‘be like everyone else’ – after all, they were ‘correct’, and I was ‘incorrect’ – you wouldn’t believe))- I spoke in a mix of Surzhik and swearing. But it was not me; it was a Mask. And then I taught myself again to speak as I wish, and not as everyone else speaks….. I’m not against swearing per se – it just doesn’t suit me personally. Speech is not only a stream of sounds and images; Speech is also an energetic stream directed from one person to another, physically penetrating under the shell of another. It’s no coincidence that people say: ‘You will become like the company you keep.’ There is not a single healthy swearer; they are all chronically ill with something. If I start swearing, then when I come into contact with the diseases of other people – they will cling to me, rather than leave immediately as they should; that is, I will not be clean enough – the vibrations of others’ diseases will become similar to my vibrations, and that’s unacceptable.

  12. For me, for example, the daily, hourly use of swear words is unacceptable. Swearing “cuts my ear.” There is a perceived strength in these words, but they are somehow destructive. However, whatever force it may be, force is force, and it just needs to be used properly (without fanaticism). To stop, to destroy disease, to drive away evil, to apply it like a spell, etc. Truthfully, many cover their abundant love for obscenity with deep roots of origin, referring to Dostoevsky, for example. One should be careful with power. IMHO.

  13. Indeed, “positive thinking” can play a cruel joke. Being in harmony with oneself and the world means honestly seeing what is happening and acting appropriately, in accordance with it—harmoniously with what is occurring. If there is a fire around, it is foolish to sit in a lotus position and convince yourself that “everything is fine, I am in harmony.”

  14. What an interesting conversation about swearing.
    I remembered from my youth—moving into a dormitory. I opened the door, and right away someone started cursing at me. I don’t usually fight, but I ended up pushing that person back several meters. At first, it was incredibly stressful. But I quickly adapted, stopped hearing the swearing, or rather, I learned not to accept its energy.
    Tavita Shauta, it must be very painful. But what inside you clings to swearing?

    • White light, passing through a glass prism, separates into the seven colors of the rainbow. Metaphorically, a person can be compared to a prism. Ideally, all seven colors—energies (chakras) in a person—should be balanced. In reality, most people exhibit an imbalance of energies. Profanity is a deliberately distorted energy of the orange chakra (Svadhisthana). A flow of curse words directed at a person causes an internal imbalance of energies and provokes a retaliatory outburst. Energy outbursts attract demonic entities (non-carbon-based life forms) that feed off these outbursts. Each person has their own unique energy balance. For example, my balance may be perceived by you as an imbalance, and vice versa. The world is diverse. There are no absolutely energetically coinciding individuals. Kindred souls are attracted to each other primarily (but not absolutely) through matching energies. For this, personal strength is needed to sense the match.

      There are no energies in a person that are bad or unnecessary, but if someone perceives and interprets the world and acts on the level of distorted energy of the orange chakra, then for me, that person feels alien, while for someone else, they may be a kindred soul. To interact with such a person, I need to readjust to their frequency range, I need to become similar to them, which means I must stop being myself, as I perceive and interpret the world and act in a different frequency range. The ability to quickly readjust and act is characteristic of a “fluid” being. However, if I constantly perceive the world at the level of beings alien to me, I will cease to be myself and become like them, which means I will wear a Mask. But… no matter how much I live in someone else’s Mask, I still remain myself, because I (and you too) have my own unique and most natural balance of energies. Not every person knows and can separate their own shade, form, sound, sense of self, idea of themselves, and individuality: the listed items are synonyms of the same.

      • The metaphor of a person as a prism was appealing. But I have questions regarding your response, Tavita Shauta, if you don’t mind.
        1. Why is it referred to as “the intentionally distorted energy of the orange chakra”? Why is it distorted? Why intentionally? How and in what way is it distorted? Is there not pure orange in it, but rather a mixture of red?
        1.2 Do distorted energies of other colors affect you as well? Or is it only the orange one?
        2. “The flow of obscene words… causes imbalance and provokes a response…” Who specifically does it provoke? From readers’ comments, it’s clear that it does not “provoke” everyone. There are people on whom obscenity has no effect at all. In fact, this “provokes” seems like a way to shift responsibility onto someone else. One could always ask the question differently: are you provoked, or do you provoke yourself?
        3. “In order to interact with a person… I need to become like them.” ?? Why? Can’t one interact while remaining oneself? And isn’t it necessary to interact with someone who directs streams of unwanted energy at you?

        I understand that you are a special, unique person. And I may not understand you. I’m trying )) and it seems to me that obscenity is somehow connected to you. It’s like those who use it are pulling on a string, at the end of which is an anchor inside you. Therefore, you have clarified the situation, but still haven’t answered: what does obscenity latch onto inside you?

        • Sure, here’s the translation to English:

          Okay, Natalia 🙂 Please. Answers 🙂

          1. Why is it “the deliberately distorted energy of the orange chakra”? Why is it distorted? Why deliberately? How and with what is it distorted? Is there not a pure orange in it, but a blend of red?

          🙂 Profane expressions in the Russian language are divided into four main categories and their combinations, meaning: male and female genitalia, their various interactions, as well as some animals, and their purpose is to cause insult, humiliation, and to demonstrate superiority over someone or something. For example, equating a woman to a female dog or calling a heterosexual man homosexual. (Try using such a word on some guy, and you’ll immediately understand who provokes whom and with what :)) When your grandfather faced difficulties, he would colorfully curse, meaning he would insult the tools that weren’t following his hands and the actions that weren’t going as desired; thus, the tools suddenly became “bad” and deserved “punishment,” which was perceived by you as a release of tension. In the same way, a man curses at a woman who refuses to relieve his sexual tension, and women also curse regarding this matter, meaning sexual energy (the energy of the orange chakra) is deliberately distorted. On a physical level, this distortion manifests itself in words that don’t reflect reality. For example, a woman is not a dog… The color is not distorted; the natural flow of energy is distorted — the process in which your grandfather was involved was disrupted, and he released it through the punishment of the tool or process with words that didn’t correspond to reality on a physical level and distorted sexual energy, coming out through the mouth, yes 🙂 through the mouth, this is a kind of ritual.

          1.2 Do distorted energies of other colors also affect you? Or only the orange one? – Yes, for example, one angry sorcerer regularly attempts to affect me with his distorted energy of the blue chakra (Ajna). And I regularly resist this demon in human form 🙂

          2. “The flow of profane words… causes imbalance and provokes a response…” Who exactly does it provoke? From the comments of readers, it is clear that not everyone is “provoked.” There are people on whom profanity does not work at all. Overall, in this “provokes,” there’s some kind of shifting responsibility to the “scapegoat.” One can always ask the question differently: are you provoked, or do you provoke yourself?

          Yes – “The flow of profane words… causes imbalance and provokes a response…” — like you, for example — “I open the door, and something hits me with profanity from the threshold; I don’t know how, usually I don’t fight, but the person flew a few meters away.” — it seems to have hit you hard since you were so strongly provoked?

          Yes, it doesn’t provoke everyone; for some, it is simply a collection of filler words used every two or three words.

          Do they provoke me, or do I provoke myself? – Well yes, why should calling someone a dog or discussing genitalia affect me or you, for example? 🙂 You can conduct an experiment — call people by mismatched words, especially strangers, and you will understand everything without my explanations.

          3. “Is it necessary to interact with someone who directs streams of unnecessary energy at you?” – No, it’s not necessary, but in many situations, it is unavoidable.

          “To interact with a person… I need to become like them.” ?? Why? Can’t you interact while remaining yourself?” – for example, I described above. Read the post about movers.

          “I understand that you are a special, unique person. And I might not understand you. I’m trying )) and it seems to me that profanity is somehow related to you. And the person who uses it is like pulling a string at the end of which is an anchor inside you. Therefore, you clarified the situation, but you still didn’t answer: what does profanity latch onto within you?” – I will repeat myself; apparently, you didn’t read everything — “…the mentioned driver, whom I was forced to travel with — loudly cursed on the phone; his field intertwined with mine — I felt how stones were flying at me in my field — each curse was a stone, I physically felt the depletion of the field and the formation of breaches in the energy cocoon — I shut down — I don’t see images behind the words — I don’t hear sound waves — I feel stones flying at me — that’s it. The end.” – If you want to talk about this in more detail, feel free to contact me in private or on Skype; my information is available on my VK page. As for here, I am putting a period at the end of this topic from my side.

          If you have any further questions or need clarification on specific parts, feel free to ask!

        • “1. Why is it called ‘intentionally distorted energy of the orange chakra’?
          Because that is how it sounds. The vibrations of profanity are destructive. If physicists were to break down the sound of profanity into sine waves, they would get a dissonant picture. If we apply this to musical intervals, the predominant interval will be the diminished third relative to the root, which musicians metaphorically call ‘demonic.’ There will be transitions to the fourth, the pentatonic, the sixth, and the minor third. Different transitions, but the destructive ones will prevail. The feelings are very similar to aggressive rock music. Many rock musicians have actually engaged in orderly outpouring and harmonization of their own and others’ painful energies.
          ‘Distorted’ presumably refers to harmonious, constructive intervals.
          Distortion either comes from the person who is cursing—intentionally, with the goal of disrupting the environment—or their energies are already distorted by something external.
          In terms of colors, I sense a dirty red combined with brown and gray.”

          • It’s really amazing how one can use references to some nonexistent physicists as justification in a discussion. The vibrations released into the world by rock musicians are certainly not devoid of harmony; I can say this as the daughter of a drummer) and they reflect a part of our energies and the energies of the world.

          • As a rock music enthusiast who has spent enough time in the rock world, I completely agree with you. 🙂 When it comes to harmony vs. disharmony, an interesting picture emerges in rock music. Dissonance/pressure/aggression is created through the effect of “distortion.” In the guitar sound itself, even without chords on the fretboard, there are already plenty of dissonant overtones. The harmony of rock music is mostly based on power chords and fourth chords, which are two consonances. This means that the guitar’s “bzzz” – yes, it can be destructive… but the connections of “bzzz” are creative. 🙂

            “It’s really surprising how one can use references to some non-existent physicists as justification in a discussion.”
            But that’s not a justification… 🙂 For justification, you should turn to Dmitry Nizyaev. He conducted such experiments and presented them quite accessibly in his “Elementary Theory of Music” as additional lectures on consonance. 🙂 Here are some excerpts.

            “We take a software synthesizer (I used Vaz Modular), set up a simple generator of a sinusoidal wave with a frequency of about 500 Hz – the note “C” in the second octave, the most convenient range for a female voice. (example). No impurities, pure sine wave, scientific experiment. We need to study the interaction of several sounds, so we create another identical generator. Just two identical waves. With identical settings, both sine waves combine “one to one,” and as a result, the sound simply gets louder, right?

            What happens if the sounds are not identical? Let’s increase the frequency of one of the generators by just 1 Hz. Now the waves combine at different points of the sine wave all the time, as if they are “crawling” over each other. At moments when their peaks align, the sounds complement each other, resulting in an increase in amplitude or loudness. But when one of the waves lags behind the other by half a period, the peaks of opposite polarities start to combine – the waves begin to cancel each other out. This occurs with a period of 1 Hz. Once a second, the sound fades away, and we hear one note (the ear cannot distinguish such a slight difference), but this note periodically changes in volume (example). In the language of sound engineers and musicians, this phenomenon is called “beating,” and its frequency exactly matches the difference between the frequencies of the two original sounds. By the way, using beats, you can, for example, tune a musical instrument to a standard (like a tuning fork) with an accuracy of up to fractions of a Hertz, even without having a musical ear.

            Thus, when two sounds interact, a third sound is born. It has no physical source; however, under different acoustic conditions, it is heard more or less clearly. Moreover, this “phantom” sound contains exactly the same overtones and has the same timbre as the sounds that produced it.

            So, we hypothesize that a combination of sounds is consonant if the “imaginary” sound – the difference of their frequencies – occupies one of the notes that falls within the first overtones of the original notes. Naturally, this is within its octave.

            The next interval, the fourth, is also considered consonant in classical music theory. Let’s check. We will expand the interval. But we’ll do this starting from the same third smoothly – to make it easier to track the changes (example). And indeed: the bass falls into an octave with one of the sounding notes.

            Let’s continue. We raise one of the sounds from “F” to “F#,” and then to “G.” At the first stop, we get one of the most mysterious and controversial intervals – the tritone, “C” – “F#.” The phantom sound gives us “A” – it turns out to be a diminished triad. This, I must say, is a very colorful harmony, literally omnipotent in music… but that’s not the topic right now. This is far from a major triad – and yet, the tritone is considered a sharp dissonance! Thus, the pattern is confirmed (example), and at the end of this experiment, we obtain a pure fifth – the difference sound once again coincides with one of the fundamental notes – which was to be expected.”

            ———–

            By the way, seasoned professional musicians with musical education, whom I directly asked “Why is minor sad?” didn’t know this. In response, they would point to books on theory (in which there was no answer; I read them), and with a superior attitude, they indicated that the question was, in fact, foolish, and that I was a fool. But the answer, as we see, is at hand: beating, destructive wave interference. And there is no varied perception here; the physics is the same for everyone. 🙂

          • It’s so interesting to see the perception of the world through sound. Thank you for the view of the world) I don’t need to study physics or music theory to understand that there’s no talk of dirt or distortions here—just a description of the laws of interaction of energies + the author’s personal worldview.

            The local discussion about profanity is quite good in that different people have shared their experiences of how profanity affects them. It’s strange to argue here) It’s like trying to convince me that I don’t exist, for instance. And that my dad and the grandfather of that girl, who comfortably swore, don’t exist either. The only reasonable conclusion from all this might be an expansion of awareness. That is what I’m satisfied with. I wish everyone the same in claiming their prize)

          • Why “no”? So, with grandpa, there are creative vibrations through cursing. (Less often, but it happens.) Sure, let them come, if they do. But if someone tries to “create” through cursing with me, I will ask them to leave – not with curses, but in a destructive way.

  15. A great reason to think was all the comments on the topic)

    What I know about what I achieved:
    1. Swearing is a loud meta-message that “you do not exist” already or I wish it were so. Here, everyone sees something – some see knives, some energy, I, as a person used to speech models and seeing nothing wrong in words, see words and the meaning behind them. I really love words when filled with the right meaning – it is the strongest magic.
    2. The first reaction to swearing is often related to the perception of oneself. Do I need the world’s confirmation that I exist and what kind of person I am? It starts with whether the person was loved right after birth and in what form – did they need to scream and stomp to see a reaction, did they need to be good, or was the only form of recognition their existence in cursing? It’s particularly sad for me to watch individuals who have a broken imprint of their self-worth without any confirmation and who need negative confirmation.
    3. If cursing is not accepted, then the question arises as to where to place it. And in the reaction to it – much can be chosen – the world is evil and needs defense, the person who spoke the bad word is the enemy, etc. For me, the story looks like swearing can be a cry for help – the person is hurting, or a form of predation, manipulation.
    I observe everything attentively, and I have a friend who once ended a quarrel with me with the unexpected phrase “I love you.” And that was it, that was what I needed to know – we sat down and started drawing something further. And it turned out beautifully.
    Or I have a neighbor who swears about the common door in the entrance; I watch this, scratch my head and say, “You don’t actually want to resolve any questions right now, and the only thing that will satisfy you is if I cut a piece off myself and give it to you.” And this of course won’t solve anything) it would just make it a habit to go nibbled)
    And apart from swearing, we are actually wanted to be nibbled in many different ways.
    For me, for example, there was a friend who returned from vacation and told me colorfully about Elbrus. I love stories and I sit there rejoicing, and I say, “Oh, I would also like to.” And I get a beast – suddenly something pops out from somewhere and starts to wiggle its paws and almost screams, “You would never be able to climb there.” I sat silently for a minute, left the money for my part of the bill at the cafe, and left. I didn’t talk for about a year, the person just disappeared. But actually, she was my work friend.
    And now, while already talking, we decided at the corporate party to live together in a room. And I saw the beast’s face again. In a horrible version, so that the person under the influence of alcohol and on the wave of the Mafia game launched a whole wild story for the entire hotel (all 500 people somehow knew me). I woke up and did not understand what was wrong with people – what happened to their faces when they spoke to me. I gathered my strength and kicked her out of the room) Well, actually at that time I couldn’t say anything and just pushed the door with the wardrobe while she was strolling around. And then, probably a month after that wild story, I calmly listened to her apologies. With regret and all. I loved that person when she was alive.
    But all these things don’t make me closed or angry or a constantly defensive being. I also remember a phrase from a book I read in childhood; for some reason I read “Notes of a Psychiatrist” – it was interesting to me at five years old) real stories about starting to work in a hospital, and the story “The Simulant Died” – the doctor thought the person was pretending but he died. So I look closely at each specific case. About swearing and everything in general.

  16. I look at small “gnawers” from a somewhat Castaneda-like perspective, although I don’t fully adopt this worldview, but there are sensible elements. For example, the story about “domestic tyrants” – no one learns awareness as well as a manipulator nearby. So I like them – it’s like walking on a blade) and therefore, I think that with this approach, one day I will become such that I simply won’t be where “the killer is lurking”) Within one lifetime, I plan to manage it)

  17. Maria, thank you for your expressed thoughts and life examples. Especially point 2 – such a strong observation!
    And the idea that swearing is a cry for help. Because it is true, something in a person screams – I’m feeling bad! Pay attention, hey, someone, help! Then we can act from the situation – if it is very necessary, we can also give the person some energy, strength. Not let them gnaw away at themselves, but rather nourish them – with attention, understanding, warmth. Or directly, straightforward – a beam of light. And good night. For neutrality.
    One person says that what touches us, offends us, is related to our pride, inflated sense of self-importance. Well, who am I that another person cannot dare to send me away? Of course, that is their right. But whether to go into this or not – that is already my right.
    Also, swearing can simply be a release of tension. It may not be aimed at anyone in particular. This is my first experience of encountering swearing. When I observed my grandfather at work in childhood. If something didn’t work out for him, the tools didn’t cooperate with his hands, and he had golden hands, he colorfully swore. For us kids, this provoked eruptions of laughter!

  18. Somehow, I forgot about Freud and the topic of his life, since I did everything I could – rummaging through myself. I think that, indeed, swearing is connected to the theme of sex, and not by chance. Just like most neuroses. And with parents. If I define for myself that swearing can be a cry for help or an indicator of the localization of pain, then I think it can be applied to Freud’s scheme of psychosexual development, which, by the way, aligns well with, for example, pagan myths and initiation rituals, and the formation of some personal attitude toward gender and sexuality. Well, I just don’t know other myths that don’t contain a binary… Oh, I just read a quote from Osho. There is, of course, the Eastern perspective. And it seems that they also won’t have swearing. Because there won’t be gender.

  19. One of my acquaintances truly laughs in response to swear words. He has a principle of not cursing. I haven’t seen him be affected or provoked by it so far.

  20. Here is the English translation:

    “Tabita Shauta, thank you for your response, smiles, and the point. You told me a lot, I’ll digest it and get in touch.

    Theo, I think the same – I believe we can build a protection system against this distorted orange energy 🙂 It can probably be sent back as well.

    Maria, please tell me the title of the article where you answered my question about how you read the thoughts of others.”

    • Here is the translation to English:

      “This does not seem like a technique, and I don’t know if it’s worth striving for and what it actually is. After studying Anglo-Saxon runes and the 4 Attas, each of the runes was truly a transformation for both myself and probably my energy level. Well, this manifested quite clearly, although I am a fact-oriented person and have never hunted for special effects – the feeling of something flowing from my head, wings – the sensation of some sensitive density growing behind my back, various sensations in my forehead, and pillars extending from my head. The difference from other practices may be that this simply happened as a result rather than as a goal. Then there were stories about erasing an imprint… and then I spent about three months getting used to it, struggling to move because I could hear absolutely everything and didn’t understand what it was.

      It was quite an event overall. It arose from my goal concerning the Circle of Runes – to become the best possible version of myself. Let’s hope that this is it! The quest, in general, continues. But there is nothing miraculous about it – I think anyone could experience something like this or something else.”

      • I’ll boast a little, Maria, I’m much much more modest)). In my view, striving for this—hearing someone else’s thoughts—definitely isn’t worth it. It seems more like a disease, and in any case, it should impose significant limitations. I can imagine if there were such a robot—on the street, all of its fuses would blow, but we are alive.

        Moreover, the question of ecology signals a yellow light. Well… it’s like opening someone else’s closet. Although, if it’s done out of love, then that’s wonderful—I remember when a loved one does something that only appeared in my thoughts—that’s fun.

        But hearing other people’s thoughts… it would be better to sort out my own…
        As for stopping projecting my own complexes onto others, reading my thoughts in other people’s heads—that’s definitely something worth learning. I’m trying to understand the thoughts expressed here. So, your comment on my first reading was a strange combination of words. I deciphered it correctly)), and that’s okay.

        • Our own and others’ thoughts, whether we consider them closed or not, still influence others. In the context I’m talking about, the thought that all women are fools, or a strong thought from an acquaintance of mine that I should, for example, be with him, are physically palpable and hit you over the head. Quite specifically. Or other places. Hurt, for instance, is clearly felt like hands around the neck. The reasons for illnesses become a bit more obvious, among many other things…

          I have an acquaintance who is a magician. He mostly keeps quiet, but I smiled at him and said, “You’re certainly peculiar – you have thoughts, and you think them.”

          “Think as if every one of your thoughts is written in huge fiery letters in the sky – that’s exactly how it is.”

          I became anxious about doubling because it truly feels like love and the most wonderful thing, but good luck finding a person with whom this is possible who won’t crash it. Almost everyone has a beautiful song of the heart inside, and nearly everyone who has tried this doubling has attempted to fit it somewhere and take possession of it. I believe this is due to ego. Because it looks like magic and everything starts to manifest, and it usually works out well for a person.

          I think that this kind of mind-reading is a method, not a goal. What the hell do I need to know those thoughts for when they are so obvious from any activity? Whatever a person does, they are telling a story about themselves. As a tool for learning energetic interaction, it is very helpful.

        • “In my view, striving to do this—hearing another’s thoughts—is definitely not worth it. It resembles a disease; in any case, it should impose significant limitations.”
          Striving to hear thoughts is a disease?… ?_?
          In reality—whether we want to or not—we already hear them. Everyone hears, whether they are magicians or not, cats, dogs, humans. When communicating in groups, this becomes obvious. It’s just that in our outdated culture, it is accepted to believe that everything in your head is solely yours. If you are thinking about something, then you invented it yourself and you’re cool! Everyone needs to be told so that they can admire you. But in reality, it was your friend, who is two meters away from you, who came up with it; they were too shy to say it… then thought that someone else had already beaten them to it and considered themselves a failure. However, if you look closely, you’ll find that without them, that thought could not even arise. It’s just that the one who said it out loud had a more suitable social standing to proclaim it.
          ——————-
          Today there was a case that relates to this. I was talking to a person. They are quite ordinary. I barely know them. We were talking about wine. Just talking. I had a fleeting thought about alcoholic balms, which I set aside for later and spoke about something else instead. Then the person paused for a moment and went on to talk about balms. If you start to observe, this happens all the time in communication.
          ————
          “But to hear someone else’s thoughts… one should first sort out their own…”
          Here again is the question: are all of them yours? I took a long time to sort mine out until I learned to distinguish my thoughts from those that are not mine.
          ————
          I think it is painful to constantly invade other people’s heads without their permission. This is precisely what many psychologists do, often without consequences. Meanwhile, victims walk around nodding their heads, “It’s a psychologist; it’s okay and necessary…” Even though their inner voice whispers, “You shouldn’t.” “But they’re a psychologist…” Forget it.
          ————
          I believe it’s healthy to be aware of where an idea in your head came from and who it originated from.
          ————
          “Well, why the hell do I need to know these thoughts when they are obvious from any activity? Whatever a person produces—they are telling a story about themselves.”
          That’s a golden thought! If only someone could see these stories unfiltered. 🙂

  21. “Any conflict is an indication of a binara that is not harmonized. And the only thing we can work with here is ourselves. And if we need to defend ourselves, we should understand that this is until clarification. That’s how you would roughly respond, I think.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enmerkar's Blog contains over a thousand original articles of an esoteric nature.
Enter your search query and you will find the material you need.

RU | EN